It was posted to fame, but today I also had no other choice, and I just want to get justice for my wife so she can die rest in peace.
Obliterated the reason why some names, please understanding, I think this is better for my child!
my wife in April 6, 2009 in Beijing, recorded by scum Qing Li, Zhao Shan robbery killed. left me and the children, the Department of scum alive strangled by 2, pinch of the four or five times, three or four minutes each pinch. It is meaningless to a man buried alive, pinch, I love all wet his pants, these are criminals in court testimony, and finally tape the mouth, nose around a dozen laps, hands and feet were also tied, dressed in the clothes with a knife, cut open, and even the dead neither let ah. so cruel means of killing Jingmei for life, Zhao Shan is a minor, his state law does not apply the death penalty, but the recorded Li Qing As adults, there is no statutory mitigating reason, why not take this scum to kill, so does the state law, or some judicial corruption. I remember not hearing the judge said to me before the first instance However, a positive compensation if the other home, selling land selling active field compensation, said of course it should be based on the lenient sentence in the sentencing, asked me if I considered, I remember I was the judge that said, my wife and I work out ho No doubt to make money. but 2 let me choose between the hard life for a life I want him to. And now this sub-judgment no meaning for me. Zhao Mountain for 15 years, Li Qing recorded reprieve, civil sentenced to more than 740,000 yuan of compensation, but Department of Legal IOUs. a not for life, two did not get a penny of compensation, as the white one. Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court judge Liu :010 -87552471. received the day I went to the Beijing People's verdict Check out CENTRE LIMITED protest. then goes to the Beijing Higher People's Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court, at the other letters and petition the NPC. remember the Second Branch of Beijing Municipal Procuratorate, the Beijing Higher People's Court review of the second instance dismissed the reasons I caution is that the death penalty is nothing less than l r with international standards in China since ancient times been Sharenchangming dynasties, and the others are sentenced to several years abroad, compensation can be ensured. and now on the criminal law of the country that I love the song meet unexpectedly Where the right to life? my child's right to exist in which the two? Here, I seriously questioned the impartiality of the law, how can we convinced the victim. Beijing, check the inspectors CENTRE LIMITED :010 -59906953 Sun, the Beijing Higher review of people's court of second instance judges Ren Weiguo :010-8526 8272.
Nanchang County, Jiangxi Province, our department - the villagers Jiang Seoul strong. I have two children than can be said to have nothing. no land no room no formal job, and some pain and left the hardships of life. In the past the good memories now become a painful, this pain can not the tears flow down to the disappearance of the sad but not of lasting. Light funeral for my wife spent over 40,000 yuan. coupled with recent running the complaint, the family has long been a poor, heavily in debt. my family moved in 1998 living in Nanchang Changbei rent now. life has fallen into extreme poverty. the white man so dead? told me how to face her dead.
suspended for 2 years the implementation of the death penalty mean? means simply died.
a: 2 years is a test period, if it were made a mistake in this, she may die, how can one sentenced to death with reprieve It will also make a mistake you people? This is simply not there, and not.
II: in 2 years does not merit does not make mistakes, to become free period, and after a period of meritorious service and change the , and then merit and commutation, and the so-called meritorious I boast [is home to spend some money to perhaps merit a], how many genuine contributions to the country made it?
III: in 2 years meritorious service to change if there is a direct term, and this is reprieve.
Zhao Shan this scum is a minor, state law does not apply the death penalty I have nothing to say. The verdict, said Li Qing-recorded crime it should be lighter, their to self-contradictory, know that I love the cause of death is a common result of Talia [2 simultaneous implementation of the] are not that it went in the robbery and murder, but it is not hands-on course, for this reason the court is very far-fetched! Do state laws on this. so cruel killing also do not have the means for life, or some judicial corruption. Judges have the discretion entirely, why not put this scum to complete it? state law enforcement people-oriented concept, I would like to state is not condoned criminal ah! can say for sure after this scum out of prison than you or I have cow B, you think, ah, most people who shall stir it. heart is certainly complacent, I'm not dead, but then slightly This is not humanity, but also reform the dogs eat shit? And family lawyer money, no money for compensation. This person does not damn you?
remember the judge said to me, is to create a society, all to appease the injured party-based. also asked me compensation if they are positive, then you home will consider [a lenient sentence on the basis of the sentencing] remember what I said: If I between the two hard election, I want it to attractiveness! and now the verdict is meaningless to me is a blank! 1: There is no life for a life 2: did not get a dime of compensation. told me how to think through?
induced in Chiu Hill said the scum, it should also be regarded as habitual robbery and murder just go steal the glass smashed cars, and only scum just like their parents born out from the beginning until now has not been there before, they know anyway son is dead not, indeed, what a cruel and unscrupulous.
written complaint before me, like the complainant
for retrial
: Jiang Long, [a pseudonym], male, Han nationality, August 1, 2000 born, now studying at Nanchang, Jiangxi - grade. Department of victims of his son.
complainant: Jiang Feng, [pseudonym] female, Han nationality, August 1, 2001 born, now studying in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province - grade. Department of victims daughter.
the complainant: Long Jiang, Jiang Feng, the father that his legal representative Jiang Seoul strong, male, Han nationality, June 15, 1982 was born in Nanchang County, Jiangxi Province - people.
complainant: Dr -, female, Han nationality , March 4, 1955 birth, Donghu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province - Department of mothers of victims.
complainant: Bear -, male, Han nationality, May 3, 1948 born, Donghu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province - Department of victims of father .
the complainant to the Beijing Second Intermediate Court in early 2009, the second sentence the first word in a small No. 2125, 2010, the High Court complex character of high criminal Criminal No. 119 .1 satisfied with the ruling, not for life, 2, not a single cent of compensation, Judgement as a white one. request a retrial, sentencing the defendant to death Qing Li recorded immediately deprived of political rights for life, to life imprisonment the defendant Zhao Shan deprived of political rights for life.
facts and reasons are as follows:
A: I love without any fault:
I love no one bite point responsibility, no injustice Wu Chou, only 29 years old so unjustly had. unlike some cases there is a dispute this or that reason. but also to our family is catastrophic damage the adults did not say, call me how to make up for my children in real life due to real injuries. helpless!
two: extremely cruel criminal means, the circumstances are especially serious:
strangle my love alive , the pinch of the four or five times, each time three or four pinch minutes, although its purpose is to stealing money, but it can be said to be in willful killing, murdered because they were afraid of looting exposure. Do not they know what will cause consequences? pinch, I love all wet his pants, and mouth are vomiting foam, and then wrapped with tape but also my wife's mouth, nose, tied hand and foot. This is not the intentional killing it? there was my wife able to resist it? Even the dead neither let go. do not not say that people like this inhuman, cruel means of killing time, strangle my wife on the couch after sitting on the field to count the money spoils, calm calm, without the slightest remorse. Although the loss of his freedom in prison, but his food to eat, but also knowledge, such as after his release, more than most people can say that you want to beef B! murderer who shall stir him ah ah! dogs reform the Chishi it? high crime rate, great harm to society! above facts are criminals in court for appeal.
III: Legal malpractice:
1, robbery would kill it? do not know certainly, if I wanted to kill people, first killed, then the gun thing, my confession, motive, subjective sense of what he said to the gun. conviction that what it? where the right to life? should not robbery Murder, Second concurrence of offenses it? criminals can then predict the results, this is no doubt that people do need to do pinch experiment fails. like this to cause death, serious consequences should not be added to their murder it? own judgments to identify my wife was briefly pressed the neck to death. means of vicious, one after another to cause my wife to death. not the slightest sympathy, if only to achieve the purpose of the gun thing, can do no harm to my love life. subjective awareness has been intentional homicide. criminal facts are clear evidence that criminals have confessed in court.
2, remember to check the hospital protest, the High Court for review when they said to me: Now Legal In this way, the death penalty with the international caution. but I want to say if the victim is Liu Xiang, Yao Ming or any other star. then I think the results certainly different. hard to our people's life is not life? not to say that everyone is equal before the law it? with international practice I support and understanding. But people are sentenced to foreign law for hundreds of years, and compensation can be ensured. dynasties of China since ancient times been Sharenchangming. to the criminal law is now so lax, they are harmonized. How can a foothold in what law? in the end is to protect whom? how the people?
IV: Judgement contradictory, and unclear facts:
1, filed with the criminal offense is not prepared to cause death of my wife causes. lines jointly implemented two, two systems that have already been identified as responsible (ie, no master and slave are the main culprits) were recorded after the said Li Qing Zhao to be light in the mountains, Qing Li recorded, but an adult, he is mentally retarded it? might as well say that Zhao Shan should not come to Beijing, or that he should not come to this world. the court for this reason is very far-fetched, the judge completely have the discretion. why not sub-LI Lu Qing death and executed immediately. I think the national people-oriented law enforcement philosophy, can not be said to be harboring criminals, conniving crime it! Fusong Songjianghe in town who have stay of execution, sentenced to death the man who hired immediately. as the case tools for committing crimes, crimes mentioned are the man. is jointly implemented two, and in the same country, the case is basically the same, why not celebrate Lee recorded the death penalty immediately , legal not? fair and just that? own judgments of the evidence the fact that the first 21 points, lying? credibility than Mr Lee said.
2, inconsistent with the testimony of two defendants, apparently in mutual blame, he said, before moving his hand, he said his first move of the hand to pleaded guilty in terms of attitude is very bad. at least none of even the most basic facts of the crime to speak out, speak clearly. from the judgments of the confession can not see, namely: can not conclude Qing Li recorded the role in the criminal process to be lighter than Zhao Shan . ZHAO Shan is just a wink, after which they are co-ordinated, active implementation of the criminal act. He is not in the criminal process is passive. is not to say that Zhao Shan, he implemented, say, on the implementation. Thus one finds in the institution Qing Li recorded to a lesser offense can not be established. even can say? can only prove that Lee recorded celebrate the adults, grave injustice:
Lee recorded the defendant has no statutory mitigating reason for celebration. a great disservice to the judiciary's prestige among the people. difficult to be convinced that the families of victims.
sum up: Request a retrial, ruling the defendant Qing Li recorded the death penalty immediately and deprived of political rights for life. whether there is suspicion of malfeasance? asked the government to be out investigations. case the facts are clear and simple. demands fair, reasonable and legal. hard to his life for a life committed crimes should not it? people still so heinous , will continue Liuzaishishang scourge. I was a little people, the first of several laws, the first few I do not know. but I know that the law should be to protect our victims. Therefore, fact-based requests to the victim point in time from the reality of justice! a just verdict.
Sincerely DATE
Supreme
order to see the details by pictures
find out you just go and ask passers- , my too much to ask? I handed it? Is it really means to kill with such cruelty are not to attractiveness. Again, let me vote for me to let him for life, no amount of money, but my wife also live , I certainly will regret it, because that is her life in return, I can not afford. award a life with my children I was willing to beg I am also, of course, I will do my best to raise them Great, I think that my heart will feel better, can also soothe the souls of my wife. I do not petition service contract. Guiqiu all excellent in this regard it is the legal experts, academics, really. empower judges hands discretion whether that is the case strictly according to law to severely punish the criminals?
No comments:
Post a Comment